
Quick links to sections in this article.
Women make up a significant percentage of the global workforce, but remain underrepresented in senior leadership and board positions. Research consistently shows that companies with more women in leadership outperform peers in profitability, innovation, and retention. However, gaps in promotion rates, mentorship access, pay equity, and organisational support continue to slow advancement.
This article examines the current landscape of women in leadership, the barriers preventing career progression, key data from leading global reports, and the corporate strategies that drive effective change.
Although the term "women in leadership" has been used as a slogan used (and sometimes abused) by businesses to polish their public, it's obvious to any curious eye that it's indeed essential to have women lead, learn, and teach, and that's not a biased opinion; it's statistics. For example:
a McKinsey analysis showed that strong gender diversity at the top was ~25% more likely to be associated with above-average profitability. Organizations with Women in Leadership making up over 30% of executives significantly outperformed those with fewer.
Experts at the International Finance Corporation note that boards and leadership teams with more women directors make better decisions under stress. Diverse teams (i.e. teams with women in leadership) are more likely to innovate and spot new opportunities.
Research at Grant Thornton also affirms women's success when faced with challenges. Women leaders tend to invest in innovation and future growth. Leaders like U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris exemplify how women bring unique perspectives and drive, highlighting why having women in leadership roles matters for a competitive edge.
Today’s corporate landscape remains heavily skewed. The status of women in leadership, compared to their qualities, is dire. Let's navigate through the latest data to get a closer look:
Women face many structural hurdles on the path to leadership. These persistent barriers include:
Women frequently miss first promotions. McKinsey reports that for every 100 men promoted to manager, only about 93 women are promoted.
Talented women often drop out of the corporate pipeline, so their share shrinks at each level.
Few companies have truly unbiased review systems. Only a small percentage of firms actually use all recommended practices (calibrated reviews, diverse panels, communication and influence for senior managers etc.) to guard against gender bias and promote inclusiveness.
Entry-level women report much lower sponsorship for organisational development training for future leaders in business settings than men. Without senior advocates championing their careers, women miss high-visibility assignments and key guidance to help them progress and make contributions.
Women are often offered lower salaries and negotiate less aggressively. The result is a persistent wage gap and lost compensation over a career.
Women are more likely to shoulder unpaid “housekeeping” tasks that go unrecognized in performance metrics.
Outside work, women spend far more time on childcare and eldercare.
Stereotypes and cultural norms can hold women back. Female leaders can face a double bind.
Sectors with inflexible work models or those slow to address gender equity tend to have even fewer women leaders.

The annual Women in the Workplace report finds persistent gaps at every level. Women make up 49% of entry-level employees but only 29% of the C-suite, a figure unchanged from last year. The report warns that with current practices, it will take decades to close the gap.
In 2025, only 55 of Fortune 500 CEOs are women (11%), and women hold about 33% of board seats. Catalyst notes that at the current pace, gender parity in corporate leadership would not occur for roughly half a century.
It’s very obvious by now, especially considering leadership competencies for 2026, that this is not a pipeline problem or a lack-of-talent issue; it’s a leadership design flaw, and the organisations still ignoring it are not being traditional or cautious; they’re simply choosing to compete with one hand tied behind their backs.
Companies committed to real change see results by implementing evidence-based strategies:
If you wish to learn about these strategies, Regent is there for you!
With offices spanning London, Dubai, Barcelona, Paris, Istanbul, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore, and Amsterdam, Regent delivers internationally accredited programmes that align local insight with global standards, supported by flexible delivery models and expert regional teams.
Strategic leadership programme for women leaders builds their competencies and strategies to advance their:
Leadership training is a powerful enabler for advancing women.
Putting more women in leadership is not a feel-good initiative. It is a strategic imperative. Companies that boost female leadership tend to be more innovative and resilient. As we move toward 2026, organisations that actively remove barriers and invest in women’s advancement will build stronger leadership pipelines and outperform those that do not.
Posted On: January 24, 2026 at 07:03:44 PM
Last Update: February 7, 2026 at 10:04:11 PM
Because leadership systems still reward visibility, sponsorship, and career timing patterns that systematically disadvantage women, especially at the first promotion to management.
Bias in evaluations, fewer sponsorship opportunities, unequal pay, invisible labour, limited flexibility, and cultural expectations around caregiving all slow progression.
Yes. Organisations with more women leaders consistently outperform peers in profitability, innovation, risk management, and employee retention.
Early sponsorship, transparent promotion criteria, leadership training, negotiation skills, and access to high-visibility strategic roles.
Strategic communication, executive presence, stakeholder influence, negotiation, decision-making under pressure, and confidence in authority.
Yes. Structured leadership training builds executive skills, confidence, and networks that accelerate readiness for senior roles.
Mentors advise, but sponsors advocate. Without senior leaders pushing their names forward, women miss critical advancement opportunities.
Yes. Flexible and hybrid models reduce attrition and keep high-performing women in leadership pipelines.
Yes. Pay gaps persist even at executive levels, often compounding over time through bonuses and equity differences.
Handpicked content to fuel your curiosity.
Handpicked content to fuel your curiosity.